Every student learns differently, and understanding how to best support individual learning needs is crucial for effective teaching. When a teacher observes that a student struggles with abstract reasoning but excels in hands-on tasks, it is essential to provide tailored strategies that support their development. This article explores the best approaches for supporting such students, using real-life scenarios to illustrate each option.
Click here Read more interesting case study based article on each TLS sub topic in my second website
A) Provide More Abstract Reasoning Activities to Challenge the Student
Scenario:
A teacher notices that a student, Emma, struggles with abstract mathematical concepts such as solving algebraic equations and reasoning through word problems. In an effort to challenge Emma and help her improve, the teacher decides to provide her with additional abstract reasoning activities, such as logic puzzles and complex problem-solving tasks.
Challenges & Considerations:
While it’s important to challenge students, forcing a student who struggles with abstract reasoning to engage in more of these activities without foundational support is unlikely to be effective. This could lead to frustration, disengagement, and further struggles. If a student has difficulty with abstract reasoning, they need a scaffolded approach that helps them gradually build these skills through more concrete, hands-on experiences first.
For Emma, the focus should be on providing a solid understanding of the foundational concepts through practical, hands-on tasks, rather than pushing her into more abstract activities right away. Therefore, offering more abstract reasoning activities without addressing her learning style may not provide the support she needs.
B) Incorporate Concrete Examples and Hands-on Activities into Lessons
Scenario:
A teacher recognizes that Emma excels in hands-on tasks, such as using manipulatives to solve math problems or conducting experiments in science. To support Emma’s learning, the teacher begins incorporating more concrete examples and hands-on activities into lessons. For example, in mathematics, the teacher uses physical objects like blocks to demonstrate concepts like fractions and multiplication, which allows Emma to visualize the abstract concepts in a tangible way.
Benefits & Considerations:
Incorporating concrete examples and hands-on activities is an effective strategy for students who struggle with abstract reasoning. By providing students with real-world, tangible ways to engage with the material, they can build a deeper understanding before moving on to more abstract concepts. This approach helps bridge the gap between concrete and abstract thinking, allowing students to make connections and internalize complex ideas at their own pace.
For Emma, using hands-on tasks will allow her to grasp foundational concepts more effectively. As she gains confidence with concrete activities, she will be better prepared to tackle more abstract tasks. This strategy respects her learning style and provides the support she needs to develop her reasoning skills in a gradual, manageable way.
C) Refer the Student for Additional Testing
Scenario:
The teacher notices that Emma struggles not only with abstract reasoning but also with other academic areas. In response, the teacher refers Emma for additional testing to understand whether there are any underlying learning difficulties, such as a learning disability, that might require specialized support.
Challenges & Considerations:
While referral for additional testing may be an appropriate step in some cases, it is not the immediate solution for a student struggling with abstract reasoning. A referral should generally be considered after other strategies have been tried, especially when the issue seems to be specific to a particular learning style, such as struggling with abstract reasoning.
Testing can help identify underlying learning disabilities or other factors, but it may not address the immediate instructional needs of the student. For Emma, the more immediate and effective response would be to provide support tailored to her learning strengths, such as incorporating hands-on activities, before seeking additional testing. Testing should not be the first response unless other interventions have not worked or if there are concerns beyond the student’s reasoning abilities.
D) Focus on Other Students Who Excel in Abstract Reasoning
Scenario:
Emma’s teacher notices that a few other students in the class excel in abstract reasoning and enjoy tasks that require logical thinking. The teacher decides to focus more on challenging these students with abstract reasoning activities, thinking that it would be a more efficient use of time, while not providing as much support for Emma.
Challenges & Considerations:
While it’s important to challenge students who excel, neglecting a student who struggles with abstract reasoning, like Emma, could hinder her academic development and engagement. Every student deserves personalized support to help them succeed, especially those who may need more foundational instruction. Ignoring Emma’s specific needs in favor of focusing on more advanced students could lead to her falling further behind and potentially becoming disengaged from learning.
Rather than focusing only on students who excel in abstract reasoning, the teacher should aim to support all students in a balanced way. This includes offering targeted interventions for students like Emma, who may need additional scaffolding to succeed in abstract tasks. The key is providing a nurturing and inclusive learning environment for every student, no matter their level of ability.
Conclusion: The Best Approach – Incorporate Concrete Examples and Hands-on Activities
The best approach to support a student who struggles with abstract reasoning but excels in hands-on tasks is B) Incorporate concrete examples and hands-on activities into lessons. By utilizing concrete materials and hands-on experiences, the teacher can help the student bridge the gap between their current understanding and more abstract concepts. This approach respects the student’s learning strengths while gradually developing their abstract reasoning skills, allowing them to progress at their own pace.
Providing tailored support in the form of hands-on activities not only fosters engagement and confidence but also helps students build the foundation they need to succeed in more abstract tasks later on.